inkling2..(colour..with a u)
Question:
as is my way when embarking on a new project i like to learn about all the elements involved sometimes its hard not to get carried away to delve _too_ deeply into the minutiae to crawl up ones own ass as it were….(oops,wrong n.g.)
i dont _think_ i am overdoing it here getting overly concerned with things that shouldnt concern me if you think i am feel free to cuff me upside the head… i want the colours in my tattoo to be bright ,bold,vivid and intense it has come to my attention that there is an apparent difference between the brightness of the colours from tattoo to tattoo firstly i’m assuming that most tattoo pics (and yes,i know about assumptions) are taken when the artwork is relatively fresh this colour brightness difference is readily apparent when browsing the portfolios at the bme wesite now some of this difference is by design but im sure some is not… i am aware that cheap photo processors "heat up" the colours to make the images more impressive HEY!!! my head is fuckin huge in that picture!! no….really….. so this got me going… (the apparent colour difference,not my huge head) trying to find out about colour… i found disturbingly little info about colour a ton about healing,diddly squat about colour granted,i am no supersearchmonkey but i find it odd,there is so little info on ink i mean,this shit is being driven into your skin with a sharpened spike i would think you may be a _little_ curious about it…. i found a page on pigment dispersion at the nz. irezumi supplier it all sounded quite logical and sensible (in spite of the fact it is a sales pitch) basically an argument for using pre-dispersed liquid colour as opposed to mixing your own powdered pigment when i ask artists what they use for colour i get funny looks and evasive answers a few have said they mix their own (that implies powdered pigment to me) a couple have said starbright apparently starbright is an acrylic which,i would think,will provide bright durable colour although… the only negative things i have heard about colour were all about starbright… (and it was on the internet,so it _must_ be factual) suggesting to an artist that i think he should use colour brand x on my tattoo is in essence,to him,an insult to his current colour i dont want some pissed off guy going at me with a tattoo gun so i guess what im asking you all for is not so much what i should _do_ but more what you_ know_ about colour (with or without a u,whichever you prefer) any illumination you can cast on this subject would be much appreciated….. oh…. on cycle was/is an anagram for cyclone heceforth all my posts shall appear with cyclone in the header line cyclone…who goes in on the 11th,to get started…. p.s.and have you _heard_ the "queens of the stone age" "songs for the deaf" wicked good shit,that……
Response:
it has come to my attention that there is an apparent difference between the brightness of the colours from tattoo to tattoo
I am not a tattooist, but it seems to me that many people do not take care of their tattoos well. They don’t heal them well and they don’t protect them from the sun. It makes a huge difference. Perhaps someone who does know more about the technicalities can comment on your other questions.
Response:
oc a couple have said starbright oc apparently starbright is an acrylic oc which,i would think,will provide bright durable colour starbright inks are very bright indeed. oc the only negative things i have heard about colour oc were all about starbright… oc (and it was on the internet,so it _must_ be factual) some people react. but some will react to other, non acrylic inks, too. it’s your call what you want to try. oc suggesting to an artist oc that i think he should use colour brand x on my tattoo oc is in essence,to him,an insult to his current colour oc i dont want some pissed off guy going at me with a tattoo gun you find the artist whose work you admire, that has the brightness you require. then there won’t be debate on inks. oc cyclone…who goes in on the 11th,to get started…. what artist did you select? oc p.s.and have you _heard_ the "queens of the stone age" oc "songs for the deaf" wicked good shit,that…… i miss kyuss. lish "it truly breaks my heart 38.9% / 30 RANA 125 / 68
Response:
(cutself) starbright inks are very bright indeed.
that may be what im seeing then starbrite may be the super vivid colours oc the only negative things i have heard about colour oc were all about starbright… oc (and it was on the internet,so it _must_ be factual) some people react. but some will react to other, non acrylic inks, too. it’s your call what you want to try.
hard to decide what i want to try there is sort of a plastic(y)(ish) look to the brightest colours so what i may be noticing is the difference between acrylic and the non-acrylics (moderate removal of text) you find the artist whose work you admire, that has the brightness you require. then there won’t be debate on inks.
just like having my cake and eating it too… i haven’t seen any of his work in person to judge the colour it looked good in photos…. but not the _very_ brightest ive seen said he has spent fifteen years refining his colour selection and that different colours are sourced from different places based on brightness,durability,blah,blah,blah… oc cyclone…who goes in on the 11th,to get started…. what artist did you select?
lannie glover at fantality im gonna go for a ride down there before the 11 so i can see some of his work in person last time i was there he was finishing a painting and there were no tattoo customers in the shop oc p.s.and have you _heard_ the "queens of the stone age" oc "songs for the deaf" wicked good shit,that…… i miss kyuss.
i can understand that qotsa,dont have the _edge_ that kyuss did what i liked about kyuss was josh and nick the warm fuzzy guitar, the brilliant riffs and the "pocket",nick is definitely "in the pocket" as kid rock said in a song somewhere(whats my name) ….got more riffs than randy rhoads… cyclone….who misses frank zappa the most…. p.s.thanks v.much for your input..
Response:
it has come to my attention that there is an apparent difference between the brightness of the colours from tattoo to tattoo I am not a tattooist, but it seems to me that many people do not take care of their tattoos well. They don’t heal them well and they don’t protect them from the sun. It makes a huge difference.
i shall take care to heal it well and will ensure it is protected from the sun thanks cyclone…..spf80
Response:
starbright inks are very bright indeed. that may be what im seeing then starbrite may be the super vivid colours
I personally wouldn’t let them near my skin, but to each his own. Acryllics are more biologically active (do a google search on xenoestrogen), and they haven’t been in use very long. some people react. but some will react to other, non acrylic inks, too. it’s your call what you want to try.
And that’s true. My concern would be for the long-term effects. hard to decide what i want to try there is sort of a plastic(y)(ish) look to the brightest colours so what i may be noticing is the difference between acrylic and the non-acrylics
Another thing is that ALL the magazines seem to post-process the photos. If you’re judging the tattoo artists’ work from magazine photos, all bets are off. One final thing: not only does aftercare enter into the equation, but the canvas’s skin tone to begin with can affect the final product. Lily white skin as opposed to olive toned, to tanned, to dark brown… inks go under a layer of this. The end result will be somewhat different depending on the darkness of that layer. Susan
Response:
One final thing: not only does aftercare enter into the equation, but the canvas’s skin tone to begin with can affect the final product. Lily white skin as opposed to olive toned, to tanned, to dark brown… inks go under a layer of this. The end result will be somewhat different depending on the darkness of that layer.
When I was last tattooed, the bloke told me that he loves getting people with my colouring to work on for tattoo competitions. I’m a redhead without significant freckles with the porcelain-pale skin that often goes with that. Apparently out skin shows off colour very nicely.
Response:
(del) that may be what im seeing then starbrite may be the super vivid colours I personally wouldn’t let them near my skin, but to each his own. Acryllics are more biologically active (do a google search on xenoestrogen)
arrrrrrrgggggggggghhhhh!! curses…. ignorance is/was bliss now im gonna be walking around in clothes made from stapled together unbleached paper towels afraid to use soap,bleach and toothpaste smelling bad,wearing no anti-perspirant scared to touch anything made from any kind of plastic and a _ton_ of other substances , and they haven’t been in use very long.
reason enough for me to avoid them they arent gonna pay me to be a test bed for their product so i dont believe that i will go that way (snizzle) Another thing is that ALL the magazines seem to post-process the photos. If you’re judging the tattoo artists’ work from magazine photos, all bets are off.
i bought _one_ tattoo mag 8.99 cdn i almost fainted when i had to pay for it has the look of an easyriders publication im not too fond of that bunch,so i didnt buy anymore but i have looked more at photos than i have live tattoo’s which is what i am going to do this week i guess One final thing: not only does aftercare enter into the equation, but the canvas’s skin tone to begin with can affect the final product. Lily white skin as opposed to olive toned, to tanned, to dark brown… inks go under a layer of this. The end result will be somewhat different depending on the darkness of that layer.
makes perfect sense im no lillywhite nor am i an olive tone but i would guess im closer to swarthiness than i am to translucense cyclone….. …..thanking you ,and running naked, into the woods, screaming…..
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – starbright inks are very bright indeed. that may be what im seeing then starbrite may be the super vivid colours I personally wouldn’t let them near my skin, but to each his own. Acryllics are more biologically active (do a google search on xenoestrogen), and they haven’t been in use very long.
I’d agree with you here Susan. I have a couple pieces done with Starbrights. I did fine with everything but Reds/oranges which ended up a scaly leathery nightmare for about a month though it looks fine now. I guess i just don’t trust the other stuff aside from the acrylic in them. I personally use Dynamic wich is a very pigment dense organic/ mineral based line. Thin consistancy which many artists don’t like but I get a very bright result and have had no reports of any hassles on the healout. So I suffice to say I am happy with the results. One final thing: not only does aftercare enter into the equation, but the canvas’s skin tone to begin with can affect the final product. Lily white skin as opposed to olive toned, to tanned, to dark brown… inks go under a layer of this. The end result will be somewhat different depending on the darkness of that layer.
This is the part that is the hardest to get a client to understand. Usually those who have darker tones I try to explain that it is kinda like looking at the colors through sunglasses. I think what I need to do is some color washes over transparency sheets to show them the effect of color shift. Ya gotta love that Lilly white skin for color rendering though… Pure heaven to work on. — JSin Lost Generation Custom Tattoo To reply Kill the idiot
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – starbright inks are very bright indeed. that may be what im seeing then starbrite may be the super vivid colours I personally wouldn’t let them near my skin, but to each his own. Acryllics are more biologically active (do a google search on xenoestrogen), and they haven’t been in use very long. I’d agree with you here Susan. I have a couple pieces done with Starbrights. I did fine with everything but Reds/oranges which ended up a scaly leathery nightmare for about a month though it looks fine now. I guess i just don’t trust the other stuff aside from the acrylic in them.
I’ve discussed this a bit with Susan through email already. And I am wondering if you can answer a question I asked her. Where does your information come from regarding Starbright ink being acrylic based? As far as I know the ingredient list on the bottle says nothing about acrylics. And so far I have not been able to find any information that indicates that Starbright is acrylic. Not to say that a msileading label doesn’t exist
. And I understand that the exact make up of the ink is probably not an easy thing to find either. You also make mention of other ingredients that you do not trust. What would those be? I have starbright ink in my sleeve that was just recently completed. Including orange. I am extremely happy with the results so far (I’m less than a week in healing the last session with the orange), especially the blues (the blue is fully healed). I have yet to suffer from what you describe as a ’scaly leather nightmare’, and in fact the last session is healing very fast and with out problem . If starbright ink is indeed acrylic based or contains other questionable substances I’ld like to pass this information (with a reputable source) on to my artist, Since he was under the impression that there was no acrylic in the ink. Thanks! Jay
Response:
JC I have starbright ink in my sleeve that was just recently completed. JC Including orange. I am extremely happy with the results so far (I’m JC less than a week in healing the last session with the orange), JC especially the blues (the blue is fully healed). I have yet to suffer JC from what you describe as a ’scaly leather nightmare’, and in fact the JC last session is healing very fast and with out problem . the outside half of my calf sleeve & my entire right forearm is starbright. i’ve had absolutely no problems either in healing the ink or keeping the ink… so far. two lish points to anyone who catches the cameo reference in that last sentence. lish "you seem to be on a different 38.9% / 30 RANA 125 / 68
Response:
two lish points to anyone who catches the cameo reference in that last sentence.
I googled it and it pointed me to an issue of Cult of the Dead Cow. Ah, sad pathetic memories of youth. I never liked CDC but this guy I was friends with used to email it to me regularly. He got really miffed at me when I told him I found it tedious and could he please stop.
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – starbright inks are very bright indeed. that may be what im seeing then starbrite may be the super vivid colours I personally wouldn’t let them near my skin, but to each his own. Acryllics are more biologically active (do a google search on xenoestrogen), and they haven’t been in use very long. I’d agree with you here Susan. I have a couple pieces done with Starbrights. I did fine with everything but Reds/oranges which ended up a scaly leathery nightmare for about a month though it looks fine now. I guess i just don’t trust the other stuff aside from the acrylic in them. I’ve discussed this a bit with Susan through email already. And I am wondering if you can answer a question I asked her. Where does your information come from regarding Starbright ink being acrylic based? As far as I know the ingredient list on the bottle says nothing about acrylics. And so far I have not been able to find any information that indicates that Starbright is acrylic. Not to say that a msileading label doesn’t exist
. And I understand that the exact make up of the ink is probably not an easy thing to find either.
Most of it is from speaking to people, distributers, and others. Can I document it … No. I also doubt that you can obtain a MSDS on the product and yes like many other pigments the makeup is very likely kept closely guarded. You also make mention of other ingredients that you do not trust. What would those be?
When dealing with any acrylic you have carriers and stablizers. They may be inert they may be active. Beacause I do not know the specifics of thier dispersent I am distrustful of what they have to use to make inks of these types stable. Again it is an issue of I don’t know what is in it so I don’t particularly trust it. My first intro to Starbrights was about 10 years ago at Ink Slingers Ball through Papillion Supply at their booth. It made me leery when they were unable to answer my querys as to what the dispersent is and what the contents are. Don’t get me wrong here I love the supplyer for Machines, grips and tubes. I just don’t like or trust the pigment line they carry. I have starbright ink in my sleeve that was just recently completed. Including orange. I am extremely happy with the results so far (I’m less than a week in healing the last session with the orange), especially the blues (the blue is fully healed). I have yet to suffer from what you describe as a ’scaly leather nightmare’, and in fact the last session is healing very fast and with out problem .
This is a YMMV issue. I seem to be sensitive to those tones in that pigment line. I also have had the same reaction with a piece I had done with Perma Pro and no it is not the classic "Red Reaction" you hear bandyed around. The skin just gets very hard and rough and it is only in areas with reds and oranges. If starbright ink is indeed acrylic based or contains other questionable substances I’ld like to pass this information (with a reputable source) on to my artist, Since he was under the impression that there was no acrylic in the ink.
If someone has a list of the Ingrediants or a MSDS on the line I would love to take a look. That way I can do my own research on what *could* be reactive. Part of the reason I use Dynamic is they have been very candid about what they use in their inks. Call me odd but I like to know what I am putting in my body and the bodies of my clients. If it does not contain any acrylics or plastics then I stand corrected but I would like to know what’s in the stuff before I use it. — JSin Lost Generation Custom Tattoo To reply Kill the idiot
Response:
two lish points to anyone who catches the cameo reference in that last sentence.
S I googled it and it pointed me to an issue of Cult of the Dead Cow. cDc was an influence, but that’s not the correct answer. lish "so crack your skull before you weep, 38.9% / 30 RANA 125 / 68
Response:
Ya gotta love that Lilly white skin for color rendering though… Pure heaven to work on.
That is exactly the reason why I’ve decided to go for a full color (or at least grayscale with red) tattoo, because i’m, like, *clear*. you can see my veins, i’m that pale. ::thinks about a tim kern shiva backpiece:: Cylence
Response:
JC I have starbright ink in my sleeve that was just recently completed. JC Including orange. I am extremely happy with the results so far (I’m JC less than a week in healing the last session with the orange), JC especially the blues (the blue is fully healed). I have yet to suffer JC from what you describe as a ’scaly leather nightmare’, and in fact the JC last session is healing very fast and with out problem . the outside half of my calf sleeve & my entire right forearm is starbright. i’ve had absolutely no problems either in healing the ink or keeping the ink… so far.
you did. and i’m making a "me three" post. my back piece is *all* Starbrite, and i’m having absolutely no problems with healing. i’m just itchy, flaky, and in that just about done but not quite finished healing [but it makes me to rub my back against corners like the cat does] stage. two lish points to anyone who catches the cameo reference in that last sentence.
"i hate rab," #3 katester — kate a. pohjola http://www.katester.net
Response:
two lish points to anyone who catches the cameo reference in that last sentence.
KA P "i hate rab," #3 well, no, not at all. those were some "ME TOO"s, not a "mE sad, sad people with no sense of internet history. lish "you have pretty good posture 38.9% / 30 RANA 125 / 68
Categories: